A FEW INTERESTING TOPICS REGARDING AGE DISCRIMINATION

84 YEAR OLD LOSES AGE DISCRIMINATION CLAIM

***

- Labour news from UNI global union – for trade unions in a global services economy. -

“The matter has been resolved on a mutual basis” declared one of the former Best Buy employees’ attorneys.

44 former Best Buy IT employees who had been laid off in June 2004 brought their ex-employer in court for age discrimination. In fact, soon after its outsourcing deal with Accenture, Best Buy announced the suppression of 130 jobs. Unsurprisingly, the management, who rebutted the allegations, was accused among other things to have laid off older employees in order to retain younger ones.
Those who became plaintiffs were 51 years old on average and won their fight. A court order recently told the company to reinstate the workers or pay them wages and benefits until their retirement age.

***
EEOC AMENDS AGE BIAS REGULATIONS TO CONFORM WITH SUPREME COURT RULING

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) today issued revised regulations on age discrimination in the workplace in accordance with a 2004 Supreme Court decision, General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline. The updated regulations, published in today’s Federal Register, are available on www.eeoc.gov

The revised regulations clarify that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) does not prohibit employers from favoring an older employee over a younger one when both are protected by the Act. The EEOC initially proposed these changes in 2006 and, after receiving public comments on its proposal, unanimously voted to approve the revisions. The public comments were largely supportive of the revisions, with both business and labor groups supporting the changes.

“With the graying of the American workforce, the ADEA has become more relevant than ever to both employers and employees,” said EEOC Chair Naomi C. Earp. “These revisions harmonize the Commission’s age discrimination regulations with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Cline, which clarified the law on this question. The decision, along with the revised regulations, will aid the EEOC in its enforcement efforts.”

The ADEA protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older from employment discrimination based on age. The ADEA’s protections apply to both employees and job applicants. Under the ADEA, it is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of his/her age with respect to any term, condition, or privilege of employment, including hiring, firing, promotion, layoff, compensation, benefits, job assignments, and training. The ADEA applies to employers with 20 or more employees, including state and local governments. It also applies to employment agencies and labor organizations, as well as to the federal government.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC and the laws it enforces is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov    ~Howdy

RESUME WRITING FOR BOOMERS

I should be an expert on this by now, but I am far from it.
I went to a temp agency when I was first laid off and was told that I should take all dates off my resume (an effort to hide my age) if I wanted to get any interviews. He was able to guess my age just by my years of work experience.
I ran this idea by another human resources person and she told me that if I removed the dates, my resume would just be ‘trashed’. Geesh – What to do?
Start your work history dating back only ten or fifteen years. So, how will this benefit you or me?
They tell us that there is no discrimination in hiring boomers out there, but it is simply a lie.
The only benefit I can see by disguising your age is that perhaps you will get an interview and be able to convince someone that you are younger than you look.

If you have any ideas regarding this, please comment or E-mail us and let us know. Otherwise, here is a good link to help you in Writing A Resume.   ~Howdy